hughrundle.net has moved to a new platform, and if you want to continue to receive RSS updates you will need to update your feed.
Please go to http://hughrundle.net/rss to pick up the new feed.
This is just a quick update, but I’m excited (possibly over-excited) about why I’m publishing this.
Last year I supported the Kickstarter campaign for a new blogging platform called Ghost. The Kickstarter was a success and the platform has been built. Currently at version 0.4, there’s a little way to go before it fully resembles the vision John O’Nolan articulated in his pitch video, but it’s already very usable. In fact, everything I was really interested in is already there – the Markdown editor, static pages, and full control over the layout, even with the Ghost.org hosted version.
With my WordPress ‘premium’ subscription ending in a few days, now seems like a good time to finally make the switch to Ghost. For the same price I’ll get most of the functionality with much more freedom. I will lose some functions, but I’ll lose a lot of clutter as well, and be able to continue to support a great product that I really believe in. I’ll be writing more about why and how I moved from WordPress to Ghost in the next few weeks.
Tonight I’ll open up the bonnet on hughrundle.net and, all things going well, by tomorrow readers will be pointed to the new platform without noticing any difference. Things usually aren’t that straightforward though, so here’s a list of some things that might go wrong:
Wish me luck, and I’ll see you on the other side.
First up on Wednesday we heard Gene Tan, Director of the Singapore National Library, officially talking about the Singapore Memory project, but really talking about his philosophy of libraries and how to manage them. Gene has worked to ensure that Singapore Memory found interesting, real stories about Singaporean lives, rather than finding stories that meet a particular target for total number, or ‘type’ of Singaporean, or that suit the political needs of Singapore’s government. He argued for small data over big data and human scale over web scale.
Gene looked for interesting stories and followed them up, rather than going for big numbers of ‘stories’. The Minister announced they would collect 5 million stories, but Gene went to him and said “I’ll give you 5000 stories not 5 million, but they’ll be really great”.
He didn’t just want stories that fit ‘types’ of Singaporeans – Gene wanted it to be real, messy, interesting.
Gene refused to have a strategic statement as SNL Director, instead he built a 50-staff skunkworks and told them to build stuff people can use, touch and feel.
Gene said that “libraries aren’t just places for storing knowledge, they are also sites of emotional experience”.
Mylee Joseph from SLNSW talked about the New South Wales State Library’s project to collect and archive social media content from NSW. This was part of the same ‘Innovation Project’ as the Wikipedia project that Simon Cootes spoke about on Tuesday. They looked at whether they should collect NSW tweets, Facebook posts etc as part of NSW written heritage as per their mandate.
Mylee pointed out that the technology to publish and distribute is in advance of technology to collect and archive. They used ‘VIZIE’ – software specifically designed for state gov agencies by CSIRO. They were particularly interested in people using social media for building/supporting community, to show what is around them, and to share funny/interesting moments. They had to decide what best represented NSW life. What topics do you capture? How do you do it? how/what do you search? An example is politics. We already have Hansard and press releases, but where are the other voices? A lot are on Twitter using hashtags like #auspol #ausvotes #spill #leadersdebate and #ausdebate
Sometimes things need context e.g. #democracysausage – this is a very Australian thing so it’s a good example of something that may be of interest to future researchers. They missed a lot of things, but also had to make decisions about what to keep. Is a retweet a duplicate? An amplification? Something else? There were also the problem of how to capture things. People don’t always/usually use the ‘official hashtag’ especially for big open public events.
In this presentation we heard about a research project on photo sharing by Australian libraries, particularly through Instagram.
The researchers did interviews / surveys with actual library staff and also used ‘Nitrogram’ – an analytics program to map the most liked images. They classified pictures as three types:
Identity, Functional and Affective. The most interacted-with images were ‘identity’ images, which surprised the team as they expected them to mostly be functional.
Instagram was difficult to manage corporately because it’s a mobile platform designed for individuals. The majority of libraries are using staff’s own equipment, some public libraries are using work equipment (iPads and iPods).
Libraries had differing views on the appropriateness of interacting with followers – should they follow them back? should they comment? Appropriate norms are still unclear.
Different libraries use it for different promotional and influencing tasks. “Library selfies” (pics of the library building) are very common. Also “Library Shelfies” as a way to promote the collections. North Carolina State Uni has set things up so that effectively their students are providing the pics.
To be successful with Instagram, you need to ensure you know what your goals are both overall and for each image:
*use (where will they appear, just on Instagram or in your library, on your marketing material etc)
Kate and Kathleen talked about a study they did of librarians on Twitter. The followed a bunch of librarians, and classified their tweets. Librarians tweeted personal things more than they thought they did. Most are reasonably cautious, although they did mostly retweet controversial things and political views.
Organisations need to ensure appropriate flexible guidelines for Twitter use as the line between professional and personal is a little unclear. But most individuals have already deeply thought things through regarding the collapse between work identity and personal identity.
A lot of tweets were just forwarding of content. The unknown question was – was there any offline collaboration as a result of tweets, as well as just information forwarding? We don’t know. Only 15 tweets from 4 participants ‘value added’ a professional opinion (contrasted with willingness to share political and personal opinions). As tweeting librarians we’re more likely to be controversial and political than engage in professional critique.
This paper (in untraditional format) is available at http://bi.ly/tweetworthy
Matt gave a great plenary speech that tied in a bit with what Gene had said earlier in the day. Matt gently chastised us for chasing hipster cred,building ‘hubs’ and wanting to be rockstars. He championed the work of libraries on the fringes – in country towns, with the sullen sporty kids with a hidden urge to write novels, in the tough suburbs. Matt urged us to fix the small, petty problems before building big fancy things. This tied together nicely with Gene Tan’s emphasis on small personal stories from real Singaporeans. Matt also took off his pants on stage, just to wake everybody up!
A couple of interesting articles he quoted were:
In my last post we considered the idea of Antifragility and how libraries might consider making our collections more anti-fragile. Today I’d like to discuss how we take the antifragile concept further by considering an antifragile approach to discovery, as well as exploring librarianship as a tool for antifragilism.
Arguably, the whole idea of libraries, particularly public libraries, is inherently one of antifragility. The public library allows those with an interest in knowledge or ideas to pursue that interest, without requiring the individual means to fund it. The more our world changes, the more valuable the public library becomes as a source of ideas, information and inspiration. Our communities become stronger and more resilient as they share and discover old skills, new ideas and inspiring stories. Continue reading
I recently read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s excellent book Antifragile: how to live in a world we don’t understand. It’s a rather sprawling, heavily footnoted opus – but with time to reflect I think Taleb has a great deal to teach librarians.
Given the word count Taleb assigns to railing against bureaucrats, corporations, universities and government institutions, he may be less than impressed by my application of his ideas to academic, corporate and public libraries. He does make an exception for municipal government, however, so perhaps he would let public librarians like myself off the hook.
Taleb is a big fan of the private library, one that allows its owner to read wherever her interests take her. A wonderful idea, of course, but one that many humans, due to a lack of means, simply cannot realise. The public (or, in some cases, academic) library can make up for this if it is managed well. Continue reading
On July 10th ALIA released The Library and Information Agenda, intended as a lobbying document for political parties and candidates running in the Federal election (announced yesterday as happening on 7 September). This document outlines ALIA’s vision for libraries and information in Australia over the next three years and asks candidates and parties nine questions. Or rather, in the fashion of these types of documents, it asks them to pledge support for ten goals, couched as nine questions.
I think ALIA has captured the aspirations of Australia’s librarians fairly well, as much as one can in such a disparate profession. This document does, however, raise some questions about ALIA and what exactly The Library and Information Agenda is trying to achieve. Continue reading
ALIA board elections are upon us for 2013. This year I decided to write to all nominees and ask three questions, noting that their answers would be published here. This was prompted by Alyson Dalby’s invitation on Twitter:
I replied to Alyson, but figured I really should ask the other nominees the same question, so I sent all nominees for board Director and Vice President positions the following email on 5 February using the addresses listed on the ALIA site: